| acitid's profile |
|
Username
|
acitid
|
|
Status
|
active
|
|
Joined
|
Jan 29, 2023
|
|
Location
|
????????
|
|
Interests
|
?????????????????? ?????, ????????????? ??????
|
|
Website
|
https://www.gipsyteam.com.br/poker/maos-do-poker
|
|
Occupation
|
929857991
|
|
Biography
|
Great article, nathan! I tried some easy 3-bets and ran into some trouble. Can't you suggest hands that you regularly 3bet/4bet with? Replydeleterepliesblackrain7926 julythank you ahmad! In my article on 3-bet pots last week, i listed all of the hands i typically 3-bet light against these players with. You can check out the movie here. Deleteanswersreplygood article, nathan. I'm a big fan of zoom poker for basically all the reasons you preferred in the first post, but in the last game space it's been very frequent and i haven't been able to win a single session. I decided to just listen to you (eventually) and go back to regular tables (better late than never). My volume was pretty low, but with your advice on buying a table, i was able to make a decent percentage in the last couple of sessions i played. I keep fishing, thanks for the work! Be careful! Blackrain7927 julthanks jorge and glad to know you're learning about progress! Deleterepliesreply hahaha! That's why i destroyed nl2 and nl5 zoom: toys were made too small, and abc poker was enough. However, i returned to the regular tables. You're right: a zoom nitfest is enough. Blackrain7903, augusti'm glad to imagine that the victim is fine! Deleteanswersanswermy 3bet is 15, wwsf is 55 but they don't care - exploit them all day Answerhow she gong der</> Replynathan, i really respect your knowledge and learned a lot from you. Not only in online poker, but also in family life.After reading your articles, i started to win in the real money game. After a while i started fighting on zoom according to your advice. Man i'm going great. Directly in it, i started with 2 bucks, and also 300 hands, my stack was 10 greens. Only the most common example is described.Sometimes i have to quit the game because i get nervous playing with stacks like 6, 8 or 10 bucks.I always play n2 (0.01/0.02) cents at a time table. Such a fact what's going on, man, you think it's just a matter of luck. Blackrain7927 decemberi'm glad my articles helped junior. Can't say if it's lucky or not. It takes a huge sample to say for sure. Deleteanswersansweri'm winning zoom at low limits at pokerstars (7.02bb/100 @). Over 300,000 hands). While everything you say is true, the most important thing to do is to immerse yourself in the world in lag. A devastating tool against nits. Replyawesome win rate, md! Fully agree and joining lag. Replythanks for writing this article. Great recommendations for zoom! Blackrain7910, septemberthanks tj, glad you're interested :) Deleteanswers reply great article man! I tend to think what a gambler would do if your 4-bet on the button against a 3-bet from the small blind with a hand like a4s gets called and the flop comes with something like a k93 rainbow? Will you continue your story or will you give up immediately (if you have 100bb at the beginning of the hand). Blackrain7928, marchthank you! Really depends on the type of player, and any story. Removeanswersanswerthere is practically zero option to figure out what type of participant is the villain. For example, there is no hood in fast forward on pp, each hubd is in a different table. The ignition looks the worst: the villain is player %-pair etc. So i also think that a good and profitable play remains against the strategy of the position. Of course, we received data about the stack, information about the amount of the bet, data about the time, but no more than that. What do you think? Replyi think zoom poker is good as a learning tool, primarily for practicing your standard lines against unknown players or regulars without obvious vulnerabilities. And it's great for comfort if you really want to sit down and play a few poker hands in a short amount of time. However, the simple fact is that the zoom table is much harder to play. Than at regular tables with similar stakes, for example, with much fewer open limps. Of course, there are ways you can still beat tables where people play tight. But you won't see someone close to a winrate looking at a desk where one plays 70% of their hands. And this idea of "trading winrate for volume", which zoom proponents speak positively of, is completely ignore the impact of the rake. If you play a lot of lag style, you are transferring about six big blinds / 100 rake in a full circle micro limit game and even more for 6 max.As a consequence, if you are not a big winner, a small drop in your actual win rate will mean a huge drop in your post-rake win rate, or even turn the customer into a losing player. For this reason, i suggest people trying to build bankroll to get away from zoom games of 10 nl or more and concentrate on serious table selection. If there are no bad players at the table, leave. In case you can't find good tables at all, stop playing. Multi-tabling or scaling 100,000 hands against a bunch of other regulars won't result in anything other than the one you burn, generating a ton of rake for the poker room. Replynathan great job, you make and provide a lot of free content. With your advice, i actually managed to stop the bleeding. It's hard to find easy gameplay on the internet these days, especially on pokerstars.Eu, which i feel remains the most difficult site for counter strike: global offensive and should be abandoned by all newcomers. Zoom really allowed me to put a lot of data in a short time, which i think every part-time visitor has to do in maps in order to understand where his game is. Blackrain7923, january thanks, i'm glad my poker advice helps! Deleteanswersreplythese games are still ridiculously bland, nathan. I will let you know in case this ever changes. Don't hold your breath... :) Blackrain7923 januaryhaha i agree with hellnative, glad the viewer is still grinding and stacking fish! deleteanswersreplyhaha, yeah man, they are still there and still attract me like flies around shit! ???? I just started streaming on twitch, the first one was last night. It will take a little time before it becomes high-quality, but your subscribers can drop in at any time. Now i mix it with 2nl fr and 5nl 6max. Only 2nl zoom games seem to go full ring, you get about 1k at peak precious minutes and about 5 at 5nl, haha, don't know why. I'm still figuring out how better do it, i mixed up the audio levels last night and played the entire session with a barely audible voice lol. ) That it might be educational in the eyes of some of your audience. If sooner or later i have more than a single viewer who looks at the pages for more than 20% of seconds, i will recommend the resource. ???? I plan on streaming a good portion of the days, probably mostly in the early hours (gmt), but also some daytime skin streams. That was a pretty good article, by the way. It's great that you started broadcasting on twitch. I'm sure you can find a lot of people interested in taking a look at a top microstakes player like the host. If you'd like, leave your twitch name here in the reviews so i can others can be found there. Replythanks, dude! Not ready to spam with a gag on my channel, however, such a hellnative step as here. You'll get some free time in that month, so for those who are interested, look forward to a fun micro-grinding first in march. I guess you're playing a higher game at that time, nathan? Where/oh are you staying? The stars are obviously cheating the regulars a lot these days with rb and the recent bs time bank. If i were to grind again, as before, i would probably look elsewhere. By the way, are you still in thailand? Replyhi hn, No luck, you get a chance to post some free advertising for your channel here. I'm sure a lot of people can learn from you personally. Yes, i still live in thailand, bangkok. In the current realities of vacationing on the island, though. I'm on instagram where i post everything: https://www.Instagram.Com/nathan79williams Recently i've only been playing this game modestly weekday, because helping the blog and my youtube channel is a ton of work. But when i do that, it's usually limits like nl25, nl50 and nl100 on sites like party or 888. Replycool, i heard that in today's world on pp full of bots and regulars, a cool field in all respects. Glad you ran out of mics, you deserve them after all the volume you used to put in, i still don't know how you managed it. I know you were still playing at higher stakes back then, but in recent years it's hard to grind volumes at the micros with such bad rb, a little bit more hard cornfields, etc. It's worth refraining from doing that. I'm not followed on instagram but i follow you. Take care of yourself! Replyhi nathan, i read and watch all of your great articles...Quite a few regular resources do not sanction the use of hud, such as gg and rio; how do you think you could ever make a short post about vorzone in pokerand fast poker without hud and read organization? Thank you for never playing these sites (i think), so you may not want to either. Just interested. It is obvious that without hud it is important to get data about user behavior and your understanding will be brilliant. Anyway, thanks and good luck at the tables Blackrain7910, febthanks thomas, glad my articles helped! I've already written about betting poker sites where you can't use hud: https://www.Blackrain79.Com/2018/05/poker-hud-banned.Html I'd always prefer to bet on forums that support hud, but as long as the games are good, i'll play there. Delete repliesreplythis comment was deleted by the author. Replysupport for heraclitus quote. Blackrain7917 junehaha, thanks! I like this quote :) Removeanswersreplyon zoom hand example #4, i'm thinking that an ace on the river is not a scary card, more often than not you're already betting 2 streets on a torn board , so it's unlikely that an ace will be in your range. If i was the bb, i would be more suspicious that you bet this card. It's unlikely you'll be batting 2 streets with ak/aq etc, so if you don't hit 2 pair with ax, why would an ace on the river make any difference? Replynitfest... You might be joking. Replythanks nathan!Overall, this is very helpful. Replyhey, in the very beginning of the example (ah3h) that if btn 5 bets us (probably all-in), should we call with this hand? Replyis there a way to beat zoom nl10? I mean that any of them make a minimum of mistakes and bet only when it is better to say something in life. They also have large 3-bet ranges, so even with the stats you can't read them so well. So where can weuse it? Replythanks nathan, i have never played zoom myself, but i can try after reading this. What sites would you recommend playing for good rakeback? Blackrain7908 marchi'm glad this article helped! Sorry, but i'm just teaching strategies, i don't recommend poker sites. If you personally have any difficulties regarding where and what to use maos de poker, you can contact us with your own web texts supplied by us.
|
|
files uploaded
|
0
|
|
